विज्ञापन होमिनेम उदाहरण: तर्कों में तार्किक भ्रांतियों को समझना

Ad hominem is a Latin term that translates to “against the person.” It refers to a तार्किक भ्रम where an argument is attacked by targeting the person making the argument, rather than addressing the argument itself. In अन्य शब्द, instead of engaging with the substance of the argument, the attacker focuses on निजी खासियतें or circumstances of the person making the argument. यह युक्ति is often used to divert attention from the actual issue at hand. विज्ञापन होमिनम उदाहरण can be found in various contexts, such as politics, debates, and even रोजमर्रा की बातचीत. It is important to recognize and avoid विज्ञापन hominem attacks to maintain a fair and rational discussion.

चाबी छीन लेना

Please note that engaging in विज्ञापन hominem attacks undermines the quality of discourse and hinders उत्पादक बातचीत. It is essential to focus on the substance of the argument rather than attacking the person presenting it.

Understanding Ad Hominem

Ad Hominem is a Latin term that translates to “against the person.” It refers to a type of argument or debate tactic where the focus is shifted from the actual issue at hand to attacking the character or personal traits of व्यक्तिगत making the argument. This fallacious approach aims to discredit the person rather than addressing the substance of their argument. In इस लेख, हम गहराई से जांच करेंगे संकल्पना of Ad Hominem, exploring इसकी परिभाषा, when it is used, and whether it is considered a तार्किक भ्रम.

Definition of Ad Hominem

Ad Hominem occurs when someone responds to an argument by attacking the person making the argument, rather than addressing the argument itself. Instead of engaging in a logical and rational discussion, the focus shifts to irrelevant व्यक्तिगत हमलाs. This fallacious argument style ले जा सकते हैं विभिन्न रूप, including abusive विज्ञापन hominem, संयोग का विज्ञापन hominem, तथा tu quoque fallacy.

एक में विज्ञापन hominem attack, the attacker attempts to undermine the credibility or character of the person presenting the argument. This can involve making derogatory remarks, questioning their motives, या हाइलाइट करना their personal flaws or पिछली कार्रवाई. By doing so, the attacker hopes to discredit the argument by associating it with नकारात्मक पहलु of the person’s character या इतिहास.

When is Ad Hominem Used?

Ad Hominem is often employed as a faulty debate strategy when someone lacks valid counterarguments or evidence to support उनकी स्थिति. Instead of addressing the substance of the argument, they resort to attacking the person making the argument. यह युक्ति aims to divert attention away from the actual issue and undermine the credibility of the opposing viewpoint.

Examples of Ad Hominem can be found in various contexts, including politics, ऑनलाइन चर्चाऔर भी रोजमर्रा की बातचीत. पहचानना जरूरी है इन logical reasoning errors और fallacious argumentबनाए रखना है a productive and respectful discourse.

Is Ad Hominem a Logical Fallacy?

Yes, Ad Hominem is considered a तार्किक भ्रम. It is a fallacy of irrelevance because it diverts attention from the argument itself and focuses on irrelevant व्यक्तिगत हमलाs. By attacking the person instead of addressing the argument, the logical reasoning behind the argument is ignored.

Engaging in Ad Hominem does not contribute to a constructive debate or the search for truth. It is एक आलोचना of argument style बजाय a valid counterargument. Recognizing and avoiding fallacious argument युक्ति like Ad Hominem is crucial for maintaining निष्ठा of logical reasoning and promoting सार्थक चर्चा.

Ad Hominem Examples in Different Contexts

Ad Hominem is a तार्किक भ्रम that involves attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself. It is a type of व्यक्तिगत हमला that aims to discredit the opponent’s character or personal traits instead of engaging in a rational discussion. Ad Hominem examples can be found in various contexts, including debates, discussions, and even रोजमर्रा की बातचीत.

Ad Hominem Examples Sentences

Here are a few examples of Ad Hominem in sentences:

1. During a political debate, instead of addressing the opponent’s policy proposals, एक उम्मीदवार resorts to व्यक्तिगत हमलाs by saying, “You can’t trust my opponent because he has एक इतिहास of dishonesty.”

2. In a discussion about climate change, rather than presenting वैज्ञानिक सबूत, someone dismisses their opponent’s argument by saying, “You’re just a conspiracy theorist who doesn’t believe in science.”

3. दौरान एक असहमति के बारे में एक चलचित्र, instead of discussing प्लॉट or cinematography, one person attacks the other’s taste by saying, “आपकी राय doesn’t matter because you have terrible taste in movies.”

Example of Ad Hominem in a Sentence

To further illustrate Ad Hominem, consider निम्नलिखित उदाहरण:

In बहस के बारे में लाभ of शाकाहारी भोजन, instead of addressing स्वास्थ्य और पर्यावरणीय पहलू, one person says, “You’re just a hypocrite because I saw you eating बर्गर पिछले सप्ताह।"

यह उदाहरण है demonstrates how the person attacking the opponent’s character rather than engaging with the argument itself. By focusing on the opponent’s पिछली कार्रवाई, स्पीकर attempts to discredit उनकी स्थिति without addressing the merits of शाकाहारी भोजन.

5 Examples of Ad Hominem

यहाँ हैं five more examples of Ad Hominem in विभिन्न संदर्भ:

1. Circumstantial Ad Hominem: Dismissing someone’s argument based on their व्यक्तिगत स्थितियाँ or background. For instance, saying, “You can’t understand the struggles of the working class because you come from a privileged background".

2. Abusive Ad Hominem: Resorting to insults and derogatory language to undermine the opponent’s credibility. For example, calling someone “stupid” or “ignorant” instead of addressing their argument.

3. Tu Quoque Fallacy: Pointing out hypocrisy in एक प्रयास to dismiss someone’s argument. An example would be saying, “You can’t criticize my smoking habit जब तुम खाओ अस्वस्थ फास्ट फूड हर दिन।"

4. Straw Man Argument: Misrepresenting the opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of addressing the actual points, one might create a weaker version of the argument and attack that instead.

5. Red Herring Fallacy: Introducing irrelevant information or diverting the discussion to distract from the main argument. For instance, changing the topic to किसी को है व्यक्तिगत जीवन instead of addressing the original point.

ये उदाहरण उजागर करते हैं la अलग अलग तरीकों Ad Hominem can manifest in debates and discussions. It is important to recognize these fallacious argument युक्ति and focus on addressing the substance of the argument rather than engaging in व्यक्तिगत हमलाया irrelevant distractions.

याद रखें, logical reasoning errors और fallacious arguments like Ad Hominem undermine the quality of debates and discussions. By understanding these examples of argument fallacies, we can strive for more productive and rational conversations that focus on the merits of तर्क presented rather than resorting to व्यक्तिगत हमलाया irrelevant critiques of the opponent’s character or style of argumentation.

Ad Hominem Fallacy: A Deeper Look

The Ad Hominem Fallacy is एक साधारण तार्किक भ्रम that occurs when someone attacks the person making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. This fallacy is often used as एक रणनीति in debates to divert attention away from the actual issue at hand. In इस लेख, हम लेंगे करीब से देखने पर at the Ad Hominem Fallacy, exploring examples, discussing when it occurs, and examining why it is considered a fallacy.

Example Ad Hominem Fallacy

To understand the Ad Hominem Fallacy better, let’s consider एक उदाहरण. Imagine a political debate where एक उम्मीदवार प्रस्तुत a well-reasoned argument के बारे में a particular policy. Instead of addressing the argument directly, their opponent responds by attacking the candidate’s व्यक्तिगत जीवन or character. This is a classic example of an Ad Hominem Fallacy, as the opponent is attempting to discredit the argument by focusing on irrelevant व्यक्तिगत हमलाs.

When Does an Ad Hominem Fallacy Occur

An Ad Hominem Fallacy occurs when someone resorts to व्यक्तिगत हमलाs instead of engaging with the substance of an argument. This fallacy can manifest in अलग अलग तरीकों, जैसे संयोग का विज्ञापन hominem, where someone dismisses an argument based on परिस्थितियां or personal interests of the person making it. एक और रूप is the abusive विज्ञापन hominem, where insults and derogatory language are used to undermine the credibility of the arguer.

Why Ad Hominem is a Fallacy

The Ad Hominem Fallacy is considered a fallacy because it is a logical reasoning error. Instead of addressing the actual merits or flaws of an argument, it focuses on attacking the person making the argument. इस तरह of fallacious argument is irrelevant to the discussion at hand and does not provide any valid critique का argument style या सामग्री.

इससे संबद्ध होना व्यक्तिगत हमलाs और irrelevant character attacks detracts from the substance of the debate and can lead to faulty debate strategies. By focusing on the person rather than the argument, प्रासंगिकता of व्यक्तिगत हमलाs becomes questionable, as they do not address the core issues being discussed. It is important to recognize and avoid the Ad Hominem Fallacy in order to maintain a productive and logical debate environment.

Ad Hominem in Media

Ad Hominem is a तार्किक भ्रम that occurs when someone attacks the person making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. It is a debate tactic जिसमें उपयोग करना शामिल है व्यक्तिगत हमलाs to discredit the opponent rather than engaging in logical reasoning. Ad Hominem is a fallacious argument that relies on irrelevant व्यक्तिगत हमलाs to undermine the credibility of the opposing viewpoint.

Ad Hominem Examples in Media 2021

2021 में, वहाँ थे कई उदाहरण हैं of Ad Hominem examples in संचार माध्यम. These examples highlight the flaws in debating and उपयोग of व्यक्तिगत हमलाs to divert attention from the actual argument. कुछ उल्लेखनीय उदाहरण शामिल हैं:

1. Circumstantial Ad Hominem: A political candidate’s व्यक्तिगत जीवन में लाया गया है लोकप्रियता बदनाम करना their policy proposals. This fallacy attempts to undermine the candidate’s credibility by focusing on their व्यक्तिगत स्थितियाँ rather than addressing the merits of their arguments.

2. Abusive Ad Hominem: दौरान a televised debate, one participant resorts to name-calling and insults instead of engaging in a substantive discussion. This fallacy aims to belittle the opponent and dismiss their arguments based on व्यक्तिगत हमलाs rather than logical reasoning.

3. Tu Quoque Fallacy: A public figure is accused of hypocrisy for not practicing what they preach. This fallacy attempts to discredit the person’s argument by pointing out उनकी विफलता का पालन करना their own principles, rather than addressing the validity of their argument.

Ad Hominem Examples in Media 2022

As we move into 2022, it is important to be aware of प्रचलन of Ad Hominem examples in संचार माध्यम. These examples serve as एक अनुस्मारक का faulty debate strategies employed by individuals and जरूरत for logical reasoning. कुछ उदाहरण देखने के लिए इसमें शामिल हैं:

1. Straw Man Argument: A news anchor गलत ढंग से प्रस्तुत an opposing viewpoint प्रस्तुत करके a distorted version of the argument. This fallacy creates एक झूठी कहानी that is easier to attack, diverting attention from the actual argument being made.

2. Red Herring Fallacy: दौरान एक पैनल चर्चा, one participant द्वारा प्रस्तुत an unrelated topic to distract from the main argument. This fallacy aims to shift the focus away from the original point of contention and derail the discussion.

3. Fallacy of Irrelevance: एक पत्रकार प्रशन the personal character of एक साक्षात्कारकर्ता instead of addressing the substance of their argument. This fallacy attempts to undermine the credibility of साक्षात्कारकर्ता by focusing on their personal traits rather than engaging with the argument itself.

Ad Hominem Examples in Social Media

सोशल मीडिया प्लेटफॉर्म हो गए हैं प्रजनन स्थान एसटी Ad Hominem attacks की वजह से their widespread accessibility and anonymity. It is important to recognize these examples and not fall victim to fallacious arguments. Some common Ad Hominem examples in सोशल मीडिया शामिल हैं:

1. Character Attack: Instead of engaging in a civil discussion, users resort to attacking the character of others. This fallacy aims to discredit the person’s argument by tarnishing उनकी प्रतिष्ठा rather than addressing the substance of their viewpoint.

2. Relevance of Personal Attacks: Users dismiss an argument by pointing out irrelevant personal details about the person making the argument. This fallacy attempts to divert attention from the actual argument by focusing on unrelated personal information.

3. Critique of Argument Style: Instead of addressing the content of an argument, users attack the style or delivery of the argument. This fallacy aims to undermine the credibility of the argument by criticizing रास्ता it is presented, rather than engaging with the substance of the argument.

By being aware of these examples of argument fallacies और non-logical arguments, हम बेहतर ढंग से नेविगेट कर सकते हैं संचार माध्यम landscape and engage in more meaningful and productive discussions. Remember, it is important to focus on the merits of the argument rather than resorting to व्यक्तिगत हमलाया भ्रामक तर्क.

Ad Hominem in Advertising and Literature

Ad Hominem is a तार्किक भ्रम that involves attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself. This fallacy is commonly used in both advertising and literature to discredit प्रतिद्वंद्वी‘s viewpoint by focusing on their निजी खासियतें or actions rather than the validity of their argument. Let’s explore कुछ उदाहरण of Ad Hominem in advertising and literature.

Ad Hominem Examples in Advertising

In दुनिया of advertising, companies often employ विभिन्न युक्तियाँ to persuade consumers to buy उनका उत्पादs। दुर्भाग्य से, some advertisements का सहारा Ad Hominem attacks दुर्बल करने के लिए उनके प्रतियोगी। कुछ उदाहरण निम्नलिखित हैं:

1. Character Attack: A popular soda brand चलाता है एक विज्ञापन अभियान where they mock शारीरिक उपस्थिति of their competitor’s spokesperson, implying that उनका उत्पाद is superior because the spokesperson is unattractive. This fallacious argument attempts to divert attention from the actual qualities of उत्पाद being advertised.

2. Relevance of Personal Attacks: एक कार निर्माता विज्ञप्ति एक विज्ञापन जिस पर ध्यान दिया जाता है la व्यक्तिगत जीवन of a rival company’s CEO, प्रकाश डाला their divorce and portraying them as emotionally unstable. By doing so, the ad attempts to discredit the CEO’s ability करने के लिए बनाने sound business decisions, rather than addressing the quality and features of कारों खुद को।

3. Faulty Debate Strategy: A fast-food chain अकड़ एक विज्ञापन where they depict a competitor’s spokesperson as unintelligent and ignorant. विज्ञापन implies that because the spokesperson lacks knowledge in एक विशेष क्षेत्र, their entire argument के बारे में the competitor’s food quality is invalid. This fallacy diverts attention from the actual taste और पोषण का महत्व of भोजन being advertised.

Ad Hominem Examples in Literature

Ad Hominem fallacies can also be found in literature, where authors sometimes use व्यक्तिगत हमलाs to undermine the credibility of एक चरित्र or their argument. Here are एक जोड़ा उदाहरणों में से:

1. Circumstantial Ad Hominem: नहीं एक उपन्यास, एक चरित्र‘s argument about the importance of पर्यावरण संरक्षण is dismissed by another character solely based on तथ्य कि पहला पात्र से आता है एक अमीर पृष्ठभूमि. दूसरा पात्र बहस है कि पहला पात्र‘s privileged upbringing makes them incapable of understanding the struggles of the less fortunate, thus invalidating their viewpoint.

2. Abusive Ad Hominem: नहीं एक खेल, एक चरित्र में संलग्न है गरमागरम बहस with another character and resorts to hurling insults and derogatory remarks instead of addressing the substance of their opponent’s argument. By attacking the character’s intelligence, appearance, or व्यक्तिगत जीवन, the character attempts to discredit their opponent’s viewpoint without engaging in a logical discussion.

It is important to recognize these examples of Ad Hominem in advertising and literature as fallacious arguments that undermine logical reasoning. By understanding these debating flaws and fallacies, we can critically evaluate arguments and separate valid points from irrelevant व्यक्तिगत हमलाs.

Ad Hominem in History and Philosophy

Ad Hominem is a तार्किक भ्रम that involves attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself. It is a debate tactic जिस पर ध्यान दिया जाता है व्यक्तिगत हमलाs rather than logical reasoning. This fallacious argument is often used to divert attention from the actual topic at hand and discredit the opponent by attacking उनका चरित्र or व्यक्तिगत स्थितियाँ.

Ad Hominem Examples in History

पूरे इतिहास में, वहाँ रहे हैं कई उदाहरण of Ad Hominem being used as a faulty debate strategy. यहाँ हैं कुछ उल्लेखनीय उदाहरण:

1. Circumstantial Ad Hominem: दौरान अमेरिकी क्रांति, loyalists who supported ब्रिटिश शासन were often attacked personally by the patriots. Instead of engaging in a substantive debate about the merits of independence, the patriots would dismiss the loyalists’ arguments by questioning उनकी वफादारी or personal interests.

2. Abusive Ad Hominem: नहीं the political arena, व्यक्तिगत हमलाs are unfortunately common. एक उदाहरण is the character attacks directed at अब्राहम लिंकन दौरान उनका राष्ट्रपति अभियान. His opponents resorted to calling him names and questioning उसकी क्षमताएं, rather than engaging with his political ideas.

3. Tu Quoque Fallacy: This fallacy occurs when someone dismisses an argument by pointing out the hypocrisy of the person making the argument. An example of this can be seen in the Watergate scandal, जहां President Richard Nixon’s supporters attempted to discredit सबूत against him by highlighting the flaws and past wrongdoings of those who brought आरोप.

Ad Hominem Examples in Philosophy

In थे रियल्म of philosophy, Ad Hominem fallacies can also be found. Here are a few examples:

1. Straw Man Argument: This fallacy involves misrepresenting प्रतिद्वंद्वीका तर्क in order to make it easier to attack. In philosophy, this can be seen when someone distorts विचार of their opponent and then proceeds to criticize the distorted version rather than addressing the actual argument.

2. Red Herring Fallacy: This fallacy occurs when someone introduces an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the main argument. In philosophy, this can be used to avoid engaging with the substance of an argument by bringing up unrelated personal details or attacking the character of the person making the argument.

3. Fallacy of Irrelevance: This fallacy involves introducing irrelevant information or व्यक्तिगत हमलावह है no bearing on the validity of the argument. In philosophy, this can be seen when someone critiques the style or character of the person making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself.

It is important to recognize these examples of Ad Hominem fallacies in history and philosophy as they highlight the flaws in debate tactics and the importance of focusing on the substance of arguments rather than resorting to व्यक्तिगत हमलाया irrelevant criticisms. समझकर इन logical reasoning errors, we can engage in more meaningful and productive discussions.

Ad Hominem Around the World

Ad Hominem, a Latin term meaning “to the person,” is a तार्किक भ्रम that occurs when someone attacks the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself. This fallacy is not limited to any specific culture or country; it can be found in debates and discussions around दुनिया. आइए ढूंढते हैं कुछ उदाहरण of Ad Hominem in the Philippines and specifically in Tagalog.

Ad Hominem Examples Tagalog

In the Philippines, just like in कोई अन्य देश, Ad Hominem examples can be found in various contexts, including politics, social mediबहसएस, और यहां तक ​​कि रोजमर्रा की बातचीत. Here are a few examples of how Ad Hominem can manifest in Tagalog:

1. Argumentum Ad Hominem: This is a classic example of Ad Hominem, where the focus shifts from the argument to attacking the person making the argument. For instance, during a political debate, instead of addressing the opponent’s stance on एक मुद्दा, one might resort to व्यक्तिगत हमलाs, questioning उनकी विश्वसनीयता or character.

2. Circumstantial Ad Hominem: इस मामले में, the person’s circumstances or वैयक्तिक पृष्ठभूमि are used to dismiss their argument. For example, if someone from a certain political party प्रस्तुत a valid point, उनके विरोधी might disregard it by saying, “Of course, you would say that, you’re just trying to protect your party’s interests".

3. Abusive Ad Hominem: This occurs when the focus shifts to insulting or belittling the person rather than engaging with their argument. It often involves name-calling, mockery, or derogatory remarks. For instance, instead of addressing the validity of किसी की राय, they might be dismissed by saying, “You’re just an ignorant fool who knows nothing about the topic.”

Ad Hominem Examples in the Philippines

उपयोग of Ad Hominem in the Philippines is not limited to विशिष्ट परिदृश्य but can be observed in various contexts. Here are a few examples of how Ad Hominem can manifest in the Philippines:

It is important to note that while Ad Hominem may seem like an effective tactic बदनाम करना प्रतिद्वंद्वी, यह है एक fallacious argument and does not contribute to logical reasoning. Engaging in व्यक्तिगत हमलाs और irrelevant personal arguments only detracts from the actual debate and hinders the search for truth.

Understanding the flaws in Ad Hominem and other logical reasoning errors पालन-पोषण के लिए महत्वपूर्ण है healthy and productive debates. By focusing on the substance of arguments rather than resorting to व्यक्तिगत हमलाs, we can promote a more constructive and meaningful exchange विचारों की।

The Impact of Ad Hominem

Ad hominem is a तार्किक भ्रम that involves attacking प्रतिद्वंद्वी‘s character or personal traits instead of addressing the actual argument they are making. This fallacy can have एक महत्वपूर्ण प्रभाव on debates and discussions, often derailing बातचीत and hindering the search for truth and understanding.

Why is Ad Hominem Fallacy Bad?

उपयोग of विज्ञापन hominem fallacies in arguments is generally considered bad for कई कारण. Firstly, it undermines सिद्धांतों of logical reasoning and rational discourse. Instead of focusing on the merits of the argument itself, विज्ञापन hominem attacks divert attention to irrelevant व्यक्तिगत हमलाएस। इससे हो सकता है विकार in communication and prevent a meaningful exchange विचारों की।

दूसरे, विज्ञापन hominem fallacies often serve as एक ध्यान भंग से the actual issues being discussed. By attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself, the focus shifts away from the substance of the debate. This can result in महत्वपूर्ण बिंदु being overlooked or ignored, preventing एक गहन जांच of the topic at hand.

तीसरा, विज्ञापन hominem attacks can create a hostile and confrontational atmosphere. When individuals resort to व्यक्तिगत हमलाs, it can escalate tensions and hinder संभावना खोजने का सार्वजनिक भूक्षेत्र या पहुंच रहा है एक संकल्प. This not only damages relationships but also diminishes समग्र गुणवत्ता बहस का.

Is Ad Hominem Ever Valid?

जबकि विज्ञापन hominem fallacies are generally seen as detrimental to logical reasoning, there are कुछ स्थितियों जहां व्यक्तिगत हमलाs may be relevant to the discussion. For example, if the character or credibility of the person making the argument is directly relevant to the topic being debated, it may be appropriate to consider their personal traits or actions. However, it is crucial to distinguish between relevant personal information और अप्रासंगिक व्यक्तिगत हमलाs.

Why is Ad Hominem Effective?

Ad hominem attacks में कारगर हो सकता है कुछ संदर्भ, despite being fallacious. They can appeal to emotions and biases, manipulating the audience’s perception of the argument and the person making it. By attacking किसी का चरित्र or personal traits, the attacker may attempt to discredit the opponent’s argument without actually addressing its substance. This can sway राय of those who are not critically evaluating the argument and can be a powerful tactic in प्रेरक संचार.

However, it is important to note that while विज्ञापन hominem attacks may be effective in influencing people’s opinions, वे इसमें योगदान नहीं देते हैं a rational and logical evaluation of the argument itself. They rely on exploiting संज्ञानात्मक पूर्वाग्रह और भावनात्मक प्रतिक्रियाएं शामिल होने के बजाय a fair and reasoned debate.

How can critical thinking be applied to the innovation of friction welding?

Friction welding: A game-changing technique is a powerful method of joining two materials by generating heat through friction and pressure. This innovative technique has revolutionized various industries and is known for its robustness and efficiency. When considering the concept of ad hominem fallacy, it is important to question how critical thinking can be applied to the development and advancement of friction welding. By avoiding personal attacks and focusing on objective analysis, researchers and engineers can explore new possibilities, improve the technique, and address any potential limitations for the benefit of numerous applications. “Friction welding: A game-changing technique”.

आम सवाल-जवाब

1. When is ad hominem used in an argument?

Ad hominem is used in arguments when एक आयोजन आक्रमण the other’s character, personal traits, or reputation instead of addressing the validity or content of their argument. This is often एक रणनीति used to divert attention away from the actual issue at hand.

2. Can you provide some ad hominem examples in sentences?

Sure, here are a few examples of विज्ञापन hominem वाक्यों में:

• “You can’t trust John’s argument on climate change because he’s a known smoker".
• "Jessica’s proposal एसटी the company budget can’t be good, she was terrible at math in school.”

In दोनों उदाहरण, the person’s character or व्यक्तिगत इतिहास is attacked instead of addressing the argument they put forth.

3. What is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?

का एक उदाहरण an विज्ञापन hominem हेत्वाभास would be: “You shouldn’t listen to उसकी सलाह on स्वस्थ खाने because she is overweight.” In this case, the person’s weight is irrelevant to the quality of उनकी सलाह के बारे में स्वस्थ खाने.

4. Can you give examples of ad hominem in media in 2021?

वहाँ थे कई उदाहरण of विज्ञापन hominem in media in 2021. एक उल्लेखनीय उदाहरण विश्व का सबसे लोकप्रिय एंव राजनीतिक बहस where candidates often attacked each other’s personal lives and character rather than focusing on policy issues.

5. When does an ad hominem fallacy occur?

An विज्ञापन hominem हेत्वाभास तब होता है जब एक व्यक्ति का चरित्र, motives, or other personal traits are attacked to undermine their argument, rather than addressing the argument itself. This is ध्यान भटकाने की एक युक्ति that avoids the topic at hand.

6. Is ad hominem a logical fallacy?

हाँ, विज्ञापन hominem का एक प्रकार है तार्किक भ्रम. It involves responding to arguments by attacking एक व्यक्ति का चरित्र, rather than addressing the content of their arguments.

7. Can you provide an example of ad hominem in a sentence?

ज़रूर, यहाँ है एक उदाहरण: “Don’t listen to Mike’s advice on investing, he’s never even been to college.” यह वाक्य है एक विज्ञापन hominem attack because it criticizes Mike’s education rather than evaluating उसकी सलाह on इसकी अपनी खूबियां हैं.

8. Why is ad hominem a fallacy?

Ad hominem is a fallacy because it diverts ध्यान away from the argument and instead focuses on irrelevant निजी खासियतें or actions. This doesn’t address the validity of the initial argument और इसलिए है a flawed line of reasoning.

9. Are there real-life ad hominem examples?

हाँ, विज्ञापन hominem fallacies often occur in रोजमर्रा की बातचीत. For instance, in a discussion about climate change, one might say, “Why should I trust आपकी राय on climate change? You drive a gas-guzzling SUV,” instead of addressing तर्क प्रस्तुत किया।

10. What are some famous examples of ad hominem?

प्रसिद्ध उदाहरण of विज्ञापन hominem शामिल राजनीतिक बहस where candidates often attack each other’s निजी खासियतें. उदाहरण के लिए, दौरान the 2016 U.S. presidential election, डोनाल्ड ट्रंप often referred to उसका प्रतिद्वंद्वी जैसा "कुटिल हिलेरी,” which is an विज्ञापन hominem आक्रमण।

यह भी पढ़ें:

• विलेय उदाहरण
• फोटोऑटोट्रॉफ़िक बैक्टीरिया उदाहरण
• रोलिंग घर्षण उदाहरण
• समांतर रेखाओं के उदाहरण
• आयनिक बंधन उदाहरण
• प्रकाश उदाहरणों का परावर्तन
• स्वयंसिद्ध उदाहरण
• सरल हार्मोनिक गति के उदाहरण
• द्विध्रुवीय द्विध्रुव बल उदाहरण
• यूकेरियोटिक कवक उदाहरण

टेकीसाइंस कोर एसएमई

टेकीसाइंस कोर एसएमई टीम भौतिकी, रसायन विज्ञान, प्रौद्योगिकी, इलेक्ट्रॉनिक्स और इलेक्ट्रिकल इंजीनियरिंग, ऑटोमोटिव, मैकेनिकल इंजीनियरिंग सहित विभिन्न वैज्ञानिक और तकनीकी क्षेत्रों के अनुभवी विषय विशेषज्ञों का एक समूह है। हमारी टीम TechieScience.com वेबसाइट के लिए विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी विषयों की एक विस्तृत श्रृंखला पर उच्च-गुणवत्ता, अच्छी तरह से शोधित लेख बनाने के लिए सहयोग करती है।

हमारे सभी वरिष्ठ एसएमई के पास संबंधित क्षेत्रों में 7 वर्षों से अधिक का अनुभव है। वे या तो कामकाजी उद्योग पेशेवर हैं या विभिन्न विश्वविद्यालयों से जुड़े हैं। संदर्भ देना हमारे लेखक हमारे मुख्य एसएमई के बारे में जानने के लिए पेज।

techiescience.com